Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of June 24-28, 2024

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Smith v. Marcus & Millichap - class action, skilled nursing, R&R, waiving objections
Usme v. CMI Leisure Mgmt - forum selection clause, marine vessel, Covid-19
Guzman v. Robinhood Markets - class action, antitrust, securities
Greater Birm Ministries v. Ala Sec of State - Nat’l Voter Registration Act, voter lists, public disclosure

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee


Pinellas Cnty v. Joiner - ad valorem taxes, sovereign immunity
Fla Bar v. Grieco - attorney discipline
In re Fla Fam Law Rules Pro - amended rules

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee


Wodford v. State - inconsistent verdict
Jackson v. State - plea, not reserving issues for appeal
Johnson v. State - pro se sanctions
Ames v. State - postconviction relief
Calvin v. Dixon - pro se sanctions
Johnson v. State - pro se sanctions
Johnson v. State - more pro se sanctions
Edwards v. Dixon - pro se sanctions
Davis v. State - pro se sanctions

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg


Pasco v. Gamble - appellate jurisdiction

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami


Int’l Speedway v. GEICO - intervention
Tropical Audubon Soc’y v. Miami-Dade Cnty - comprehensive plan, agency’s findings, evidence
Caster v. Miller - disqualification of counsel
Motors v. Alvarez - default, excusable neglect
Alvarez v. State - agency’s findings, evidence, hearsay
SafePoint v. Castellanos - attorney’s fees, multiplier, evidence
Pomeranz v. Rones - personal jurisdiction, waiver
Williams v. State - postconviction relief
Jolibois v. Sch Bd of Miami-Dade Cnty - declaratory action, disqualification of judge
Tucker v. Little Haiti Housing Ass’n - ownership of property, summary judgment evidence
State v. Myers - motion to suppress, invocation of Miranda rights
Tyson v. Perez - sanctions. discovery violations
Wilson v. State - Nelson inquiry
Whalen v. Choquehuanca - domestic violence injunction, unrecorded hearing
E Coast Invests v. Delia - writ of possession, inconsistent verdicts
92 On Bay v. River Front Master Ass’n - sale of common elements, temporary injunction
LXA v. State - uncharged crimes, admissibility
Crown Asset Mgmt v. Bribiesca - small claims action, service of process, dismissal
Bernard v. State - resentencing
Verijet v. Vision Leasing - default, excusable neglect

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach


Frank v. State - sentencing, costs of supervision
SoHo Ocean v. PG Secur - agency, duty to disclose, principal
Gentry v. State - general magistrate, recommended order, preservation

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach


Hurley v. Veon - marital settlement, equitable ownership, intangible asset, attorney’s fees
Nelson v. State - rehearing; sentencing
Terry v. State – postconviction relief
State v. Boutiette - vacated conviction, self-defense immunity
Auto Club Ins v. Express Care - reimbursement, PIP benefits, statutory schedule
DiGiorgio v. DiGiorgio - dissolution, notice of appeal, jurisdiction
Hoehaver v. State - suppression, plain smell doctrine, warrantless search
Long v. Family Support Srvcs - negligence, foster child placement, jury instruction  
Prince v. State - Anders appeal, firearm enhancement
Phillips v. State - Anders appeal, cost of prosecution

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland


Wright v. State - sentencing
Gary v. State - postconviction relief, preservation
DCF v. LD - termination of parental rights


The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.